И прольется кровь

I͡A - naemnyĭ ubiĭt͡sa-neudachnik. I͡A obmanul zakaz chika, no moĭ obman raskrylsi͡a, i i͡a byl vynuzhden bezhatʹ, spasai͡a svoi͡u zhiznʹ. Ta, iz-za kotoroĭ i͡a reshilsi͡a vzi͡atʹsi͡a za ėto delo, umerla, ne dozhdavshisʹ moeĭ pomoshchi, tak chto vse bylo vpustui͡u. I teperʹ i͡a okazalsi͡a na samom krai͡u zemli, gde meni͡a nikto ne znaet i gde mne ne ot kogo zhdatʹ pomoshchi. A mezhdu tem presledovateli dyshat mne v zatylok..."Krovʹ na snegu", "I prolʹetsi͡a krovʹ"... Ėti dva romana svi͡azany nekimi si͡uzhetnymi niti͡ami. No svi͡azʹ ikh mozhet okazatʹsi͡a glubzhe, chem nam kazhetsi͡a. Chto zhe ozhidaet chitateli͡a dalʹshe?

I — a hired killer, a loser. I cheated ordering Chica, but my deception was exposed, and I was forced to flee for his life. The one where I decided to take the case, he died without waiting for my help, so it was all for nothing. And now I was on the edge of the earth, where nobody knows me and where I'm not one to wait for help. Meanwhile, the pursuers are breathing down my neck...“blood on the snow”, “there will be blood”... These two novels are connected by some narrative thread. But their connection may be deeper than we think. What awaits the reader on?