Между "_ежами"_ и "_лисами"_. Заметки об историках

"Lis znaet mnogo, ezh?- odno, no vazhnoe"?- ėto vyskazyvanie Arkhilokha sėr Isaĭi͡a Berlin uspeshno primenil dli͡a klassifikat͡sii pisateleĭ i filosofov. Takoe protivopostavlenie stalo populi͡arno i u istorikov nauki, i u teoretikov menedzhmenta. Na "trudi͡ag" i "kreativshchikov" mozhno razdelitʹ, navernoe, li͡uboe professionalʹnoe soobshchestvo; odnako sozdaetsi͡a vpechatlenie, chto osobo primenimy podobnye ėtiketki k istorikam. No naskolʹko vzaimosvi͡azannymi okazyvai͡utsi͡a ėti gruppy? Kak oni otnosi͡atsi͡a drug k drugu? Kak realizui͡utsi͡a ikh kharakteristiki v professionalʹnoĭ dei͡atelʹnosti istorikov? Predlagaemai͡a kniga predstavli͡aet soboĭ rassuzhdenii͡a vokrug ėtoĭ temy. <br>Osobennosti upakovki: T͡Svet Chërnyĭ, Belyĭ

"The Fox knows many, hedgehog?— one but important"?— this saying of Archilochus sir Isaiah Berlin successfully applied for the classification of writers and philosophers. This opposition became popular among historians of science, and management theorists. "Workaholic" and "creatives" can be divided, probably, any professional community; however, the impression that especially applies such labels to the historians. But how interconnected are these groups? How they relate to each other? How are their characteristics in professional work of historians? This book represents the thoughts around this theme.
Features of packing: Color Black, White